How does electric car adoption vary across US states?
Electric cars tend to be more popular in blue states. Why?
A few months ago, I wrote about Americans’ attitudes towards electric cars. Levels of scepticism are relatively high: less than half think that EVs were better for the climate than gasoline; and the majority are concerned about cost, driving range, and the impact on national manufacturing. These are understandable concerns.
There was also a wide partisan gap in attitudes. Republicans were more sceptical than Democrats.
Looking at international statistics, it’s clear to see that the US is proving to be a tougher market to crack for electric carmakers. Just 10% of new cars sold in 2023 were electric, compared to 22% in the EU, 38% in China, and the majority of cars in leading countries such as Sweden or Norway. See the chart below.
To be clear, electric car sales have still been rising in the US, just not with the same enthusiasm as in many other markets.
In this article, I wanted to look underneath the national data to understand patterns of EV adoption across the US. Which states are leading the way, and how large are the gaps across the country?
Electric car adoption state-by-state
Which states have the most electric cars on the road?
Here, I’ll look at data from the US Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center. Its latest state-by-state data is from 2022, but I doubt the overall patterns will be dramatically different with a 2023 update.
In the map below, you can see the share of cars on the road that are electric. Don’t confuse this with new sales, where EVs make up a larger share than this.
For context, this figure for the US as a whole was 1.2% in 2022. Again, this is so low because it takes time for new cars to replace all of the existing cars on the road, with lifetimes of a decade or more.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, California has the highest rates, with a share of 3.5%. In fact, EVs are popular along most of the West coast (and parts of the East coast).
I’ve made an interactive version of this chart available so you can explore it in more detail.
An obvious question that comes to mind is: are EVs more popular in blue (Democrat) states?
Below, I’ve shown the distribution across states, grouped by their political leaning. This is based on results from the last few elections: maybe there will be some swings later this year. One dot is one state.
All of the 10 leading states lean Democrat. Red states tend to cluster at much lower shares, with all but two (Utah and Florida) below the national average (1.2%).
Of course, being a blue state doesn’t guarantee EV popularity: there are many blue states that also have shares well below 1%.
Again, I’ve made an interactive version available so you can explore the distribution of the states for yourself.
Finally, in case you need another option to explore the data, I’ve made an interactive table where you can rank or search for particular states.
Electric cars are more popular in richer states
What explains the differences across US states?
One obvious explanation is just differences in attitudes to electric cars. That might be the takeaway that you’d get from the survey data I looked at previously. Republicans are more sceptical about the benefits (environmental or economic), so red states have much lower rates of adoption.
That probably explains some of the difference. But maybe not all of it. Affordability and charging infrastructure are the biggest concerns for drivers, so I expect that also plays some role.
In the chart below, I’ve plotted EV adoption rates against the average personal income for each state. This economic data comes from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income is the sum of wages, dividends, interest, rents, and government benefits. It’s higher than disposable income since it doesn’t yet account for taxes, but is probably a reasonable proxy for income and affordability across states.
There is an imperfect but positive correlation. The strong outlier on the far right — which has more electric cars than you’d expect based on income — is California, where governments have provided bigger support for EVs. If you were to remove it, the positive relationship on the chart would be even more obvious.
Electric cars tend to be more popular in richer states.
It’s not that obvious whether there is any causal link here. Certainly, there is a rational explanation for why this could be the case. While the upfront cost of electric cars is falling pretty rapidly — and in some cases is now competing with petrol ones — it has still been the biggest barrier over the last decade. Electric cars have been unaffordable for most households, and it’s mostly the elites or the passionate early adopters who have been buying them.
It would totally make sense, then, that richer states would have more electric cars. This would also be good news for future trends. If it’s only about economics, then electric cars will really take off in the more stubborn states too, so long as the costs continue to fall.
This simple explanation is complicated by the fact that Republican states tend to have lower incomes per person. So, do poorer states just have fewer EVs because they’ve been too expensive, or do they have fewer because they tend to be more right-leaning and there is strong cultural and political opposition to them?
This positive relationship still seems to hold true — but less strongly and with more outliers — when looking only at Democrat or Republican states. Perhaps, then, it’s some combination of the two?
Electric cars get more popular with income (or affordability) but with different slopes depending on the underlying sentiment towards them.
How does charger availability vary across states?
The other big factor that affects driver confidence is the charging infrastructure. No one buys an electric car if there is nowhere to charge it.
Now, a word of caution. I get asked questions like, “Does X have enough chargers?” quite a lot. The assumption is that there is a simple definition of “enough” and that this number is the same across every country or city in the world.
It’s actually pretty hard to assess and compare different settings without really considering the local context. American suburbs, where everyone lives in a detached house with a big driveaway that they can charge their car in, would need far fewer public chargers than dense cities where everyone lives in a flat and almost no one has a garage. Areas where employees can charge their cars at work will need fewer than areas without these sorts of companies.
So, there is no universal number that will tell us whether a country, a state, or a city has “enough”.
With that disclaimer in mind, let’s look at the ratio of electric cars and public chargers in each state. This is given as the number of electric cars per public charging port, based on figures from the US Department of Energy at the end of 2022. These ratios might have changed in the last year or so, depending on how charging infrastructure has scaled with new EV sales.
Lower numbers are generally better: you’d rather have 10 cars sharing a charger than 100.
There’s not a massive difference between the “average” blue and red state. Most are clustering in the 15 to 30 EVs per charger range. The distributions strongly overlap. Some of the states with the fewest electric cars per charger are Republican. California, where EVs are most popular has one of the higher ratios, at 34 cars per charger.
The chart above includes both fully-battery electric and plug-in hybrid cars. I’ve also plotted these ratios with only fully-battery electric included. The conclusions don’t change much, but obviously, every state’s ratio improves (goes down) slightly. California’s ratio, for example, falls from 34 down to 24.
If you plot the cars-to-charger ratio against the adoption of EVs (see below), the relationship is not particularly clear. Or, at least, not the defining factor for states with the highest popularity. Public charger availability is not much better than in some states with low adoption rates.
This weak relationship is particularly true for Democrat states. If we look only at Red states, there is some positive relationship: more chargers correlate with a more popular EV market.
There’s no question that charger availability is important for potential EV owners. But from a surface-level look at the data, I’m sceptical that this is the main factor holding back EV sales in many states. Cost and social attitudes seem like the biggest barriers to adoption.
I suspect a large part of Americans slow adoption of EVs is simply that fuel is so cheap in the US. Anywhere else, electric cars are dramatically cheaper to run; I'm not sure this is so true in the US. In the UK we pay huge (>100%) fuel duty on petrol or diesel; electricity is subject only to a 5% VAT rate. And the untaxed resource cost of fuel is lower in the US to start with, of course.
I'm a fairly well-off plug-in hybrid owner (3 yrs), living in blue states for 60+ years. Certainly I'm aware of anecdotes about contrarians in red states purposely blocking access to chargers, etc. But anecdotes often steal the lede from baser motivations: the wallet. (I think Texas is a prime example of this; massive adoption of solar/wind power while maintaining a "redder" attitude.) Anyway, I risk giving too much credence to my own story, but I think it's obviously true for many. many people. (a) the gas-powered version of my car was ~ 10k cheaper. (b) I was able to recoup almost all of this differential through US and (blue)state tax credits. But (c) the 7.5k was via tax credits, which means I had to OWE 7500 in US income tax to get 7500 back. I'm retired, so my solution was to move ~$45 k from a retirement (tax-deferred) account to my savings account; aka "income". So that I could be taxed $7500 at the end of the year. So that I could get a tax rebate of $7500. The Europeans among you may be surprised to learn that, for a couple, the first ~30k of income is tax-free (standard deduction), and the next ~$60k is taxed at ~11%. In other words, you have to have an income of over $100k to owe $7500 in taxes, and less than that means less rebate. I would bet a lot of money on the proposition that (US) people of any political persuasion would adopt EVs in far greater numbers if the price difference of the 2 models (gas and EV) were made equal in another way. Less maintenance = less cost, so EV's are a savings even at equal prices. As others have said, gas is cheap in the US, and politically it's easy to rationalize staying with gas. (I just want to add that the current administration tightened the rules on the tax credit essentially to domestically-produced vehicles, so the millions that might have bought a plugin hybrid Toyota were left with fewer options, which drives down adoption rates.)