I found your Substack a few months ago after a referral from Dr Julio Friedmann, and looking at your new book’s Table of Contents in ‘Clearing the Air’ this sounds great!
Is there a section of the book where we could see how to pivot our energy pathway’s and strategy at scale? With America forced on a ‘radical push-back’, how can our state government now make a stair-step pivot of readjusting our carbon capture, green energy, and grid reliability needs.
Looks awesome Hannah. Weird question if I may. This could be a great "reference" book for places like schools or workplaces. When someone asks one of these questions the book can be used to answer it. I don't think an eBook can be easily shared with DRM in place.. Is a PDF version possible, even if much more expensive?
I hope you reach a very large audience with this book. The questions are all so very relevant to the issues we face. A TV series should be based on this information. It should be compulsory viewing/ reading fr all politicians
The question you don't appear to have even considered is "What if my premise is wrong!".
You won't even state your argument in clear terms, instead dressing it up as 'Climate Change' as though the climate should be somehow kept in a static condition, a condition that it has never been in history.
The hubris and conceit of thinking humans should and can maintain just the right conditions to support the current lifestyle of humans is staggering.
Just like the leading scientific beliefs of the past are now seen to be crazy ideas, the notion that Co² causes climate change, that the change is negative and that we tried to remove and not add Co² to the atmosphere to promote plant life will be seen just as mad as the practice of rectal insufflation.
Unfortunately, once people get an idea, however mad that idea may be, it takes a long time for it to be commonly accepted as discredited. After all, they were seriously blowing smoke up rectums as a bona fide medical practice for over 150 years and up to the 1850s!
CONGRATS!!!!
I found your Substack a few months ago after a referral from Dr Julio Friedmann, and looking at your new book’s Table of Contents in ‘Clearing the Air’ this sounds great!
Is there a section of the book where we could see how to pivot our energy pathway’s and strategy at scale? With America forced on a ‘radical push-back’, how can our state government now make a stair-step pivot of readjusting our carbon capture, green energy, and grid reliability needs.
Super interested to see what you have to say on solar geoengineering. Will grab a copy as soon as I can
Congratulations
Looks awesome Hannah. Weird question if I may. This could be a great "reference" book for places like schools or workplaces. When someone asks one of these questions the book can be used to answer it. I don't think an eBook can be easily shared with DRM in place.. Is a PDF version possible, even if much more expensive?
I hope you reach a very large audience with this book. The questions are all so very relevant to the issues we face. A TV series should be based on this information. It should be compulsory viewing/ reading fr all politicians
The question you don't appear to have even considered is "What if my premise is wrong!".
You won't even state your argument in clear terms, instead dressing it up as 'Climate Change' as though the climate should be somehow kept in a static condition, a condition that it has never been in history.
The hubris and conceit of thinking humans should and can maintain just the right conditions to support the current lifestyle of humans is staggering.
Just like the leading scientific beliefs of the past are now seen to be crazy ideas, the notion that Co² causes climate change, that the change is negative and that we tried to remove and not add Co² to the atmosphere to promote plant life will be seen just as mad as the practice of rectal insufflation.
Unfortunately, once people get an idea, however mad that idea may be, it takes a long time for it to be commonly accepted as discredited. After all, they were seriously blowing smoke up rectums as a bona fide medical practice for over 150 years and up to the 1850s!
Really? What did modern peer reviewed science get wrong about writing 1000s of papers proving that it is a thing?
And why do you know better than 1000s of scientists David?
amazing! any way to buy in USA?